banner



How To Setup Raid 5 On Windows Server 2012 R2

75 Replies

  • Are you using spinning rust or SSD?

    It is not recommended to use spinning rust for RAID v, merely using SSD is perfectly fine.

    Was this mail helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • At 2TB drives, four of them and a inexpensive H330 controller and quondam Windows, prophylactic to assume this is spinning rust and therefore... no RAID 5.  With four drives, RAID x is the simply rational option.

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • michaelwoodward5 wrote:

    Disk 0 Bone

    Disk 1

    Disk ii

    Deejay 3 File data

    RAID arrays don't continue data in one identify or another.  Your OS and files volition be on the same array.  Once you make your array, one all the existing information is gone, and two the Bone will see but a single drive.

    Was this mail helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • i would never experiment with raid on a live datadisk :)  for starters.

    back up your data (don't know how much it is) , once the data is backed up create a raid 5 volume of the datadisk and the 2 empty ones
    creating an empty array is very quick , restore data and your good to go.
    brand sure you have a decent backup in place , raid 5 is redundant but not the top solution.

    I've had some friends who extended / created their raid sets without backups and ended up with a big empty volume ... you lot don't want that :)

    Was this mail helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • Do you have four disks in the server currently? Are they in RAID at present? If so, which level?

    You cannot replace 2 drives in a RAID 5 at the same time.

    If you don't have RAID now, you need to backup and restore the data in one case the RAID is created.

    Yous are ameliorate off going to a 4 bulldoze RAID ten.

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • Setting upwards RAID is generally very fast.  Few minutes.  Grab a coffee, that's virtually the longest it will take.

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • yous demand to back up ALL your data outset, as RAID prepare up volition need empty drives

    why R5 though, at that place is a valid reason to use it, just as far every bit I can recall it Volition have issues sooner rather so afterward equally the maths behind the larger  >TB drives, is going to give you lot problems so far equally longevity goes

    why not get an additional bulldoze, and get R6 ? better redundancy and still has decent R/W speeds

    Was this postal service helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • If I simply convert the 3 2TB disks to RAID v or 10 in the assortment I will still take Disk 0 which volition hold the Bone correct?

    Was this mail service helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • michaelwoodward5 wrote:

    If I only convert the 3 2TB disks to RAID 5 or 10 in the array I volition still have DISK 0 which will agree the OS correct?

    You are disruptive RAID and partitions.

    What is your background in Information technology?

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • R230 only has 4 drive trophy,

    Drive 0 is Bone, Recovery, and an H partitioning - Planned on using this partition for VSS

    Drive 1 empty

    Drive 2 empty

    Bulldoze four File server.

    Was this postal service helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • michaelwoodward5 wrote:

    R230 merely has four drive bays,

    Bulldoze 0 is OS, Recovery, and an H segmentation - Planned on using this sectionalization for VSS

    Drive 1 empty

    Drive 2 empty

    Drive 4 File server.

    You can't just add a drive into a RAID assortment.  You demand to fill-in, create the array, then restore to the assortment.

    Was this postal service helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • michaelwoodward5 wrote:

    R230 only has four bulldoze bays,

    Drive 0 is OS, Recovery, and an H partition - Planned on using this partition for VSS

    Bulldoze 1 empty

    Bulldoze two empty

    Drive 4 File server.

    RAID takes all of the drives and makes one array and in doing so you will lose whatsoever information stored on them.

    To create a new RAID array you demand to practise a backup of the data first.

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • michaelwoodward5 wrote:

    Disk 0 Os


    Based on what you've said, is it also condom to presume y'all are running Server 2012 r2 on bare metallic, instead of using a hypervisor and VMs?

    Was this postal service helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • michaelwoodward5 wrote:

    If I only convert the 3 2TB disks to RAID 5 or 10 in the array I will however accept Deejay 0 which volition concur the Bone right?

    Yous need to start over.  NOne of this is okay at all.  YOu demand to either support and restore once you fix all this, or merely commencement from scratch.  But this is worse than the original bad idea.

    Was this postal service helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • Here is a screenshot of my disk. This may help.

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • DragonsRule wrote:

    michaelwoodward5 wrote:

    Disk 0 OS


    Based on what you lot've said, is it also prophylactic to assume yous are running Server 2012 r2 on bare metallic, instead of using a hypervisor and VMs?

    Oh man, I forget to even expect at that.  Doh.

    More than reason to offset over.

    Was this postal service helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • Ok, What do yous suggest. I have a file server which is fully backed up.

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • michaelwoodward5 wrote:

    Ok, What exercise you suggest. I have a file server which is fully backed up.

    Y'all should starting time over and setup OBR10 and install a hypervisor on it and then install your server as virtual on top of it.

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • michaelwoodward5 wrote:

    Here is a screenshot of my disk. This may help.

    All it does is tell u.s.a. that the install is screwed upwardly and you demand to outset over.

    • Under no condititions should y'all non exist virtualized.
    • Under no conditions should you not accept RAID on all the disks
    • Under no conditions should anything but RAID 10 exist used with four disks
    • Nether about no conditions should your hypervisor, OS and information be on dissimilar disks

    You need all four of these things fixed before yous talk most anything else.  These are "must do" items.  Don't use this in production until all four are addressed.  None are in any way adequate to skip.  IF you add together more disks, and then you tin can talk about non-RAID 10 options.

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • Yes no hypervisior or VM

    Was this postal service helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • michaelwoodward5 wrote:

    Ok, What do you lot suggest. I take a file server which is fully backed up.

    Start over, RAID 10 (aka OBR10), Hyper-5 2016, install your server on meridian of that.

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • Scott Alan Miller wrote:

    michaelwoodward5 wrote:

    Ok, What practise you suggest. I accept a file server which is fully backed upward.

    Start over, RAID x (aka OBR10), Hyper-V 2016, install your server on top of that.

    All 4 HDDs are not the aforementioned size, though.

    OP - is replacing the other 2 drives an selection?

    --edit - actually, it looks like but the fourth disk is smaller, then you only need to replace that one.

    Was this mail helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • Unfortunately I am in production. This is our file server. We are a small store and the server did not take RAID set up. That is what I am trying to fix. If RAID 10 is the manner to become what would exist my next steps. By the way I actually appreciate all the communication.

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • Yes my plan is to supercede the 2 one TB driver with ii 2TB drives.

    Was this mail helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • michaelwoodward5 wrote:

    Unfortunately I am in production. This is our file server. We are a small shop and the server did not have RAID set upward. That is what I am trying to set up. If RAID 10 is the manner to go what would be my adjacent steps. By the way I really appreciate all the advice.

    one) Make sure all 4 HDDs are the same size

    2) Backup everything

    three) create RAID10 array, which wipes all disks

    4) install hypervisor

    5) Install OS in a VM (or restore OS to a VM if you don't desire to start fresh)

    6) Restore information

    --edit - 2a) fill-in again

    2b) test the backup

    2c) test it again

    Was this postal service helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • michaelwoodward5 wrote:

    Unfortunately I am in production. This is our file server. We are a small store and the server did not have RAID set. That is what I am trying to fix. If RAID 10 is the way to go what would be my next steps. By the mode I really appreciate all the communication.

    Backup all data before y'all begin.

    Make sure all the drives are the aforementioned size.

    Setup OBR10.

    Install Hyper-V (information technology'south complimentary)

    Install your Server Bone as a virtual on elevation of it.

    Restore backups to new server

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • The 4th disk is the largest 2TB bulldoze.

    Was this postal service helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • michaelwoodward5 wrote:

    The 4th disk is the largest 2TB drive.

    Sorry, first disk, not fourth.  That ane appears to exist merely 1TB.  You said you were replacing two and 3, but didn't mention one.

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • Correct the 1st disk(0) is the Bone and recovery partitions. My plan was but to RAID five Disks 1, 2, and 3. But I guess that'southward not the manner to go from what I accept been hearing.

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • michaelwoodward5 wrote:

    Right the 1st disk(0) is the OS and recovery partitions. My plan was just to RAID 5 Disks 1, 2, and three. But I guess that'south not the way to go from what I have been hearing.

    Correct - you lot exercise not want to stick with your original programme.

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • So here's the rub, I have a file server which is in production and gets backed upwards nightly. I've purchased 2 2TB disk to supplant Disk 1 and 2. From what I've read I demand to be setting up RAID 10. But to do this I need all 4 disks. Since purchasing another disk is not an options and wiping the Os is not an selection. What does anyone suggest? I feel similar I'm between a rock and a difficult place.

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • How much space are yous really using on Deejay 1 and Deejay 4?

    Was this mail service helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • Disk 0 65GB

    Deejay 1 0

    Disk 2 0

    Disk 3 1.2TB

    Was this postal service helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • You are 100% certain y'all can't get another 2TB bulldoze?

    The only halfway decent solution I tin think of isn't very good.  Create a RAID1 of deejay 0 and ane.  It will waste half of the infinite on disk ane, only it will work.  Create another RAID1 of disk 2 and iii.

    That volition give you RAID arrays, then y'all've got some redundancy in case of bulldoze failure.  Everything else we said applies - backup, backup, test!  Create arrays.  Install a hypervisor and install your OS in a VM.

    As soon as possible go another 2TB drive and then you lot tin can wipe this out and start fresh with RAID10.

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • michaelwoodward5 wrote:

    So here's the rub, I have a file server which is in production and gets backed upwards nightly. I've purchased two 2TB disk to supervene upon Disk 1 and 2. From what I've read I need to be setting upwards RAID 10. But to do this I demand all 4 disks. Since purchasing another disk is non an options and wiping the Os is not an selection. What does anyone advise? I feel like I'yard between a stone and a hard place.

    If you lot are unable (or unwilling) to start from scratch then yous might be stuck with what y'all take.

    Y'all will need matching drives to do the RAID 10, without that pace you are stuck. Seems like a small price to pay to become the server setup correctly.

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • What are my benefits of going with RAID 10 over RAID 5?

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • michaelwoodward5 wrote:

    What are my benefits of going with RAID 10 over RAID five?

    1) IOPS - yous're using 4 disks instead of 3 and you are not using parity

    2) security - RAID 5 rebuilds on large arrays are very deadening and if there is a trouble during that slow rebuild the entire assortment may exist lost.

    Was this mail service helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • And then basically speed and some reliability during the rebuild is the benefit.

    On the downside I would have our main file server downwardly for 10 amount of time which it rebuilds and from what I take seen I would accept to reload the Bone. Correct?

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • michaelwoodward5 wrote:

    And then basically speed and some reliability during the rebuild is the benefit.

    "some" is an understatement.  If you lose a drive in RAID five the chances of losing everything are much higher than if you have RAID 10.  With 2TB drives I would say y'all'd be safer by not using RAID 5 at all and simply using single disks for your data.

    michaelwoodward5 wrote:

    On the downside I would have our main file server down for X amount of time which information technology rebuilds and from what I have seen I would have to reload the Bone. Correct?

    To properly setup your Server you need to do this anyway.

    To be clear, there is no 'rebuilding' when creating a new array.  Creating an array only take a few minutes.  Or do y'all hateful fixing things, then you are using a hypervisor and VMs?  Aye, that volition have a while to get properly setup.

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • No  I am non using VM's or a Hypervisor.

    Then If I get the tertiary 2TB disk my steps are to swap out Deejay, 0, 1 and two, re-install the Os, fix RAID 10, and restore the file server from backup? That would give me an 8TB file server correct?

    Was this mail service helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • michaelwoodward5 wrote:

    No  I am not using VM's or a Hypervisor.

    So If I go the 3rd 2TB disk my steps are to swap out Disk, 0, 1 and 2, re-install the OS, ready RAID 10, and restore the file server from fill-in? That would give me an 8TB file server correct?

    Y'all should use a Hypervisor and VM, there is no downside to this only upside.

    You will not reinstall the OS, you will install a hypervisor and setup a virtual server on top of it. It will take virtually the same amount of fourth dimension. Hell, you can do a P2V of your current server and be upward and running really quick.

    RAID reckoner: http://www.raid-calculator.com/

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • michaelwoodward5 wrote:

    No  I am not using VM's or a Hypervisor.

    So If I get the tertiary 2TB disk my steps are to swap out Disk, 0, ane and 2, re-install the Bone, gear up up RAID 10, and restore the file server from backup? That would give me an 8TB file server correct?

    I know you aren't now.  I was saying that information technology will accept a piddling time to get them setup, especially because information technology's new to you.

    Swap out disks, setup RAID.  RAID is always commencement because you lot tin can't employ the storage until the RAID is configured.

    iv 2TB drives in a RAID10 gives you lot 4TB of space.

    Was this postal service helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • If I'chiliad reading the OP'south comments right, it looks similar he is letting Windows manage the raid assortment instead of letting the raid card itself handle information technology.

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • Sean Alvis wrote:

    If I'm reading the OP's comments correct, it looks like he is letting Windows manage the raid array instead of letting the raid carte du jour itself handle information technology.

    OP has no RAID at all so nothing is managing it.

    Was this mail helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • michaelwoodward5 wrote:

    So basically speed and some reliability during the rebuild is the benefit.

    On the downside I would have our master file server downwardly for X amount of time which it rebuilds and from what I take seen I would accept to reload the OS. Correct?

    Right, all of the downside is in getting it set correctly.  All of the upside is in information technology running safer, better, easier and faster.

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • Correct. No RAID set up up. Was going to use Dell Open Managing director Server Administrator to set upwardly the RAID.

    Was this mail helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • Yous have to setup the RAID during boot, because setting up RAID 10 volition destroy information on your OS drive, since you will adding that bulldoze to the RAID. I would call in some outside expertise. In that location are lots of ways this can plow into a very bad twenty-four hour period.

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

  • What type of backup does this server uses?

    Any other bachelor server/desktop for utilise for a few hours?

    Are yous open up to virtualization at all?

    Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

Read these adjacent...

  • Snap! Windows Autopatch, Confluence Zero-Day Flaw, your SaaS data, Venus, & WDCC

    Snap! Windows Autopatch, Confluence Naught-Day Flaw, your SaaS data, Venus, & WDCC

    Spiceworks Originals

    Your daily dose of tech news, in cursory. When you say 1984, many remember of the novel past George Orwell, but practice you know what else happened in 1984? On this day, 38 years agone, Alexey Pajitnov released the offset version of Tetris which became a hugely p...

  • Spark! Pro series – 6th June 2022

    Spark! Pro series – sixth June 2022

    Spiceworks Originals

    Welcome to a brand-new Week!  Since information technology is Mon, idea I would bring you another Meridian 10 listing to start your week, this fourth dimension of tech quotes. 1.      Warren G. Bennis: "The factory of the future will have on...

  • Nerd Journey # 172 - Ease the Mind through Daily Reporting with Evan Oldford

    Nerd Journey # 172 - Ease the Mind through Daily Reporting with Evan Oldford

    All-time Practices & General IT

    If you've ever wondered what makes someone in escalations management want to keep doing it, this week's interview with Evan Oldford sheds some light on that and how nosotros can manage our own escalations.  Nosotros'll follow Evan through his experience with internsh...

  • How do I block specific YouTube channels?

    How do I block specific YouTube channels?

    Security

    I take a need to block YouTube channels. All the research I am doing is turning up no results in using YouTube or Google account settings to reach this. I can't just block YouTube. I need to permit YouTube but exist able to block specific channels. I use...

  • Is this a job I can actually do?

    Is this a task I can actually exercise?

    IT & Tech Careers

    I recently told a vendor that I was ever open up to exploring new job opportunities. He mentioned this to a friend of his who is a technology director at a mid-sized manufacturing company. The technology manager reached out to me for an interview for a ne...

Source: https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2021828-setting-up-raid-5-on-server-2012-r2

Posted by: diazcipen1977.blogspot.com

0 Response to "How To Setup Raid 5 On Windows Server 2012 R2"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel